Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TM · against 11 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #7 of 12 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score6 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including TM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | TM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 13 reported | 11.6% | 4.7% | 100% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 12 reported | 8.4% | 6.4% | 82% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 9 reported | -3.4% | 3.9% | 0% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 11 reported | Not reported | 6.8% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.25T BRL (≈$225.8B) | 57 | 50 | |
| 2 | 197.9B EUR (≈$217.7B) | 52 | 53 | |
| 3 | 117.0B USD | 49 | 56 | |
| 3 | 119.7B USD | 49 | 48 | |
| 5 | 332.9B USD | 38 | 45 | |
| 6 | 186.1B USD | 37 | 49 | |
| 7 | 228.5B USD | 34 | 40 | |
| 8 | 174.8B EUR (≈$192.3B) | 32 | 56 | |
| 8 | 151.4B USD | 32 | 61 | |
| 10 | 249.7B USD | 31 | 46 | |
| 11 | 137.5B EUR (≈$151.2B) | 29 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score