Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to McDonald's Corporation
How McDonald's Corporation stacks up
MCD · against 1,557 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #897 of 1,558 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including MCD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.6% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.8% vs peer median 6.4%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.4% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MCD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MCD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,529 reported | 5.3% | 4.4% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,595 reported | 6.9% | 8.8% | 39% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 571 reported | 4.8% | 6.2% | 41% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,468 reported | -0.6% | 54.0% | 4% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MCD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 210.5B KRW (≈$152M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 553.9B KRW (≈$399M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 444.9B KRW (≈$320M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 1.91T KRW (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 33M MYR (≈$7M) | 100 | 53 | |
| 897 | 1.9B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 42 | 49 | |
| 897 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score