Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TM · against 12 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #11 of 13 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score2 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including TM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | TM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 13 reported | 5.5% | 5.5% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 13 reported | -59.6% | -3.2% | 0% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 13 reported | 10.9% | 6.8% | 67% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.15T MXN (≈$116.3B) | 82 | 87 | |
| 2 | 117.0B USD | 72 | 56 | |
| 3 | 151.4B USD | 65 | 61 | |
| 4 | 137.5B EUR (≈$151.2B) | 60 | 70 | |
| 5 | 186.1B USD | 54 | 49 | |
| 8 | 119.7B USD | 44 | 48 | |
| 9 | 332.9B USD | 42 | 45 | |
| 10 | 249.7B USD | 41 | 46 | |
| 11 | 119.4B USD | 37 | 39 | |
| 11 | 228.5B USD | 37 | 40 | |
| 13 | 197.9B EUR (≈$217.7B) | 26 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score