Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Teekay Corporation Ltd.
How Teekay Corporation Ltd. stacks up
TK · against 193 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
83/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #17 of 194 · scores higher than 92% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including TK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 83?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.2% vs peer median 6.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 88% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.1% vs peer median 5.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 92% of peers. EBITDA yield: 30.1% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 189 reported | 14.6% | 5.2% | 91% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | 30.1% | 11.9% | 97% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | Not reported | 5.9% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | 59.6% | 50.6% | 57% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 55 | |
| 3 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 254M USD | 96 | 88 | |
| 5 | 6.4B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 13 | 5.4B USD | 87 | 78 | |
| 13 | 1.6B USD | 87 | 51 | |
| 15 | 3.3B USD | 86 | 74 | |
| 16 | 1.2B USD | 85 | 59 | |
| 17 | 1.2B USD | 83 | 68 | |
| 18 | 363M USD | 82 | 37 | |
| 18 | 9.2B USD | 82 | 77 | |
| 20 | 670M USD | 81 | 40 | |
| 20 | 6.0B USD | 81 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score