Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to GeoPark Limited
How GeoPark Limited stacks up
GPRK · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
81/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #73 of 387 · scores higher than 81% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score39 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including GPRK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 81?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 87% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.4% vs peer median 5.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 92% of peers. EBITDA yield: 29.8% vs peer median 12.1%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -12.5% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GPRK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GPRK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 13.8% | 5.8% | 87% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 29.8% | 12.4% | 92% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 27.6% | 6.0% | 95% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 65.5% | 60.0% | 55% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GPRK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 69 | 110.6B HKD (≈$14.2B) | 82 | 47 | |
| 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score