Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TJX · against 25 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #7 of 26 · scores higher than 76% of peers · safety percentile 56
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)3 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including TJX · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TJX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 20 reported | 1.34× | 0.50× | 16% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 26 reported | 0.56 | 0.89 | 68% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 26 reported | 1.15× | 1.16× | 44% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 137.5B EUR (≈$151.2B) | 92 | 70 | |
| 2 | 2.15T MXN (≈$116.3B) | 91 | 87 | |
| 3 | 114.1B USD | 89 | 91 | |
| 4 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 71 | 58 | |
| 5 | 249.7B USD | 65 | 46 | |
| 6 | 97.6B CHF (≈$112.3B) | 63 | 59 | |
| 7 | 151.4B USD | 56 | 61 | |
| 8 | 678.2B CNY (≈$94.9B) | 55 | 69 | |
| 9 | 659.6B HKD (≈$84.4B) | 53 | 72 | |
| 10 | 197.9B EUR (≈$217.7B) | 47 | 53 | |
| 11 | 78.5B EUR (≈$86.4B) | 47 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score