Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TIC · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #1,660 of 2,437 · scores higher than 32% of peers · safety percentile 32
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)244 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including TIC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TIC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.81× | 0.41× | 30% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | 1.82 | 0.61 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 2.91× | 1.62× | 83% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 1,656 | 595M USD | 32 | 60 | |
| 1,657 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 10.4B CNY (≈$1.5B) |
| 32 |
| 35 |
| 1,658 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 32 | 24 |
| 1,659 | 1.65T KRW (≈$1.2B) | 32 | 50 |
| 1,660 | 2.3B USD | 32 | 24 |
| 1,661 | 120M EUR (≈$132M) | 32 | 26 |
| 1,662 | 1.0B USD | 32 | 45 |
| 1,663 | 28.4B USD | 32 | 55 |
| 1,664 | 20.9B USD | 32 | 61 |