Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TIC · against 657 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #465 of 658 · scores higher than 29% of peers · safety percentile 32
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)81 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including TIC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TIC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 647 reported | 0.81× | 0.41× | 29% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 635 reported | 1.82 | 0.65 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 628 reported | 2.91× | 1.58× | 88% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 38 | |
| 2 | 4.5B USD | 100 | 33 | |
| 3 | 350.8B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 4 | 185.7B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 55 | |
| 5 | 28.9B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 461 | 15.7B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 32 | 47 | |
| 462 | 17.4B HKD (≈$2.2B) | 32 | 52 | |
| 463 | 10.4B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 32 | 35 | |
| 464 | 1.65T KRW (≈$1.2B) | 32 | 50 | |
| 465 | 2.3B USD | 32 | 24 | |
| 466 | 2.8B USD | 32 | 52 | |
| 467 | 6.9B NZD (≈$4.1B) | 31 | 54 | |
| 468 | 3.7B USD | 31 | 64 | |
| 469 | 26.9B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 31 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score