Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
THRM · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #920 of 1,585 · scores higher than 42% of peers · safety percentile 42
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)158 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including THRM · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | THRM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 0.45× | 0.50× | 53% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 1.34 | 0.56 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 2.06× | 1.48× | 71% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 916 | 1.7B USD | 42 | 60 | |
| 917 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 13.9B THB (≈$389M) |
| 42 |
| 42 |
| 918 | 2.3B CNY (≈$320M) | 42 | 38 |
| 919 | 4.0B USD | 42 | 36 |
| 920 | 931M USD | 42 | 44 |
| 921 | 390M USD | 42 | 59 |
| 922 | 352M HKD (≈$45M) | 42 | 58 |
| 923 | 3.9B MXN (≈$210M) | 42 | 30 |
| 924 | 44.1B USD | 42 | 35 |