Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to THOR Industries, Inc.
How THOR Industries, Inc. stacks up
THO · against 325 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
29/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #280 of 326 · scores higher than 13% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score24 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including THO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 29?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 77% of peers. Operating margin: 2.1% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 68% of peers. Return on invested capital: 3.3% vs peer median 7.3%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.6% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = THO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | THO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 311 reported | 3.3% | 9.8% | 14% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 327 reported | 2.1% | 9.1% | 10% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 309 reported | 2.6% | 4.5% | 23% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 294 reported | 4.1% | 12.0% | 15% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 329 reported | 12.6% | 31.4% | 10% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around THO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 2 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 274 | 4.1B USD | 30 | 34 | |
| 280 | 3.51T KRW (≈$2.5B) | 29 | 50 | |
| 280 | 681.8B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 29 | 50 | |
| 280 | 3.2B USD | 29 | 46 | |
| 280 | 4.0B USD | 29 | 36 | |
| 280 | 7.9B USD | 29 | 26 | |
| 285 | 2.7B USD | 28 | 43 | |
| 285 | 26.5B SEK (≈$2.6B) | 28 | 24 | |
| 287 | 76.3B TWD (≈$2.4B) | 27 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score