Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMBP · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,148 of 1,604 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score160 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including AMBP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | AMBP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | 5.2% | 7.3% | 39% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 4.4% | 6.4% | 37% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 0.2% | 3.3% | 20% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | Not reported | 7.7% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 12.3% | 30.2% | 13% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1,148 | 7.6B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 28 | 21 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1,148 |
| 123.8B CNY (≈$17.3B) |
| 28 |
| 57 |
| 1,148 | 5.1B CNY (≈$718M) | 28 | 34 |
| 1,148 | 1.82T JPY (≈$12.4B) | 28 | 57 |
| 1,148 | 2.7B USD | 28 | 43 |
| 1,148 | 431M USD | 28 | 41 |
| 1,148 | 96M CHF (≈$111M) | 28 | 47 |
| 1,148 | 26.5B SEK (≈$2.6B) | 28 | 24 |
| 1,148 | 1.0B USD | 28 | 37 |