Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.
How International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. stacks up
THM · against 1,320 other Basic Materials companies
Valuation
28/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #945 of 1,321 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score132 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including THM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 79% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.7% vs peer median 3.6%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -0.4% vs peer median 2.6%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = THM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | THM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,281 reported | -0.6% | 3.8% | 21% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,352 reported | Not reported | 8.6% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | -0.4% | 2.6% | 36% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,275 reported | 35.2% | 61.0% | 25% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around THM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 219M MYR (≈$48M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 945 | 5.1B GBP (≈$6.6B) | 28 | 43 | |
| 945 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score