Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tredegar Corporation
How Tredegar Corporation stacks up
TG · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
95/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #109 of 2,394 · scores higher than 95% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score252 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including TG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 95?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 79% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 94% of peers. EBITDA yield: 21.5% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 95% of peers. Earnings yield: 13.2% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 13.0% | 3.8% | 95% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 21.5% | 7.0% | 94% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 9.0% | 3.7% | 79% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 92.6% | 50.5% | 78% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 109 | 12.6B NOK (≈$1.2B) | 95 | 71 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score