Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp.
How Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. stacks up
TFPM · against 1,320 other Basic Materials companies
Valuation
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #708 of 1,321 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score132 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including TFPM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.A mix: stronger earnings yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Basic Materials peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.3% vs peer median 8.5%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.7% vs peer median 2.6%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 73% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.1% vs peer median 3.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TFPM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TFPM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,281 reported | 7.1% | 3.8% | 73% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,352 reported | 6.3% | 8.6% | 39% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | 3.7% | 2.6% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,275 reported | 39.2% | 61.0% | 29% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TFPM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 219M MYR (≈$48M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 708 | 1.0B AUD (≈$686M) | 46 | 45 | |
| 708 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score