Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tidewater Inc.
How Tidewater Inc. stacks up
TDW · against 123 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
76/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #32 of 124 · scores higher than 73% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score16 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including TDW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 76?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: -1.0% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 69% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 23.9% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 92% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 19.6% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TDW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TDW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 127 reported | -1.0% | 0.5% | 44% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 99 reported | 23.9% | -3.3% | 65% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 122 reported | 19.6% | -0.7% | 90% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TDW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 4.1B USD | 98 | 60 | |
| 3 | 4.7B USD | 98 | 56 | |
| 3 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 29 | 4.3B USD | 78 | 60 | |
| 31 | 3.1B USD | 77 | 39 | |
| 32 | 4.7B USD | 76 | 40 | |
| 32 | 6.6B USD | 76 | 28 | |
| 32 | 3.9B USD | 76 | 72 | |
| 35 | 2.1B USD | 74 | 65 | |
| 35 | 2.1B USD | 74 | 58 | |
| 37 | 4.1B USD | 73 | 56 | |
| 38 | 35.9B HKD (≈$4.6B) | 72 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score