Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
How Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. stacks up
TDS · against 495 other Communication Services companies
Growth
9/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #449 of 496 · scores higher than 9% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score48 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including TDS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 9?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 99% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -39.0% vs peer median 3.0%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 82% of peers. Revenue growth: -5.3% vs peer median 3.0%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TDS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TDS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 502 reported | -5.3% | 3.0% | 18% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 278 reported | Not reported | 8.8% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 491 reported | -39.0% | 3.0% | 1% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TDS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94.7B CNY (≈$13.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 35.4B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 18.5B USD | 100 | 81 | |
| 4 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 4 | 17.62T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 449 | 3.6B CNY (≈$499M) | 9 | 17 | |
| 449 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score