Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to USA TODAY Co., Inc.
How USA TODAY Co., Inc. stacks up
TDAY · against 470 other Communication Services companies
Valuation
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #220 of 471 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including TDAY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -4.8% vs peer median 2.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.3% vs peer median 7.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 75% of peers. EBITDA yield: 15.5% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TDAY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TDAY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 461 reported | -4.9% | 3.0% | 18% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 493 reported | 15.5% | 8.7% | 75% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | 7.3% | 7.6% | 48% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 467 reported | 18.4% | 48.9% | 22% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TDAY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 226M SEK (≈$23M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 220 | 385.6B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 53 | 76 | |
| 220 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score