Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TD · against 917 other Banks & Insurance companies
Ranked #657 of 918 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score92 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including TD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its book yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | TD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 928 reported | 5.3% | 8.1% | 20% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 228 reported | Not reported | 10.3% | — | — | Context only |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 507 reported | 1.7% | 8.1% | 22% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 914 reported | 44.1% | 78.2% | 17% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.2B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 3.3B HKD (≈$428M) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 134.4B HKD (≈$17.2B) | 98 | 44 | |
| 1 | 65.1B HKD (≈$8.3B) | 98 | 43 | |
| 1 | 6.0B HKD (≈$762M) | 98 | ||
| 657 | 699M USD | 28 | 48 | |
| 657 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 4.5B USD |
| 28 |
| 56 |
| 657 | 4.2B CHF (≈$4.9B) | 28 | 28 |
| 657 | 440.5B SEK (≈$44.0B) | 28 | 35 |
| 657 | 203.7B USD | 28 | 64 |
| 666 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 27 | 47 |
| 666 | 6.26T JPY (≈$42.6B) | 27 | 68 |
| 666 | 12.7B USD | 27 | 59 |
| 666 | 14.6B USD | 27 | 64 |