Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TCPC · against 122 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #22 of 123 · scores higher than 83% of peers · safety percentile 86
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)13 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including TCPC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TCPC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 104 reported | 1.65× | 0.54× | 19% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 117 reported | 1.04 | 0.59 | 16% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 120 reported | 13.21× | 2.24× | 88% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 2 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 352.8B KRW (≈$254M) | 98 | ||
| 4 | 466M AUD (≈$308M) | 98 | ||
| 5 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 97 | 84 | |
| 18 | 342M EUR (≈$376M) | 87 | 77 | |
| 19 | 584M AUD (≈$385M) | 87 | 61 | |
| 20 | 685M USD | 86 | 68 | |
| 21 | 275M USD | 86 | ||
| 22 | 352M USD | 86 | 62 | |
| 23 | 498M USD | 85 | 90 | |
| 24 | 384M USD | 85 | ||
| 25 | 353M USD | 84 | 59 | |
| 26 | 577M EUR (≈$635M) | 83 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score