Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TCOM · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #585 of 1,585 · scores higher than 63% of peers · safety percentile 63
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)158 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including TCOM · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TCOM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 0.17× | 0.50× | 76% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | -0.05 | 0.56 | 96% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 1.33× | 1.48× | 43% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 581 | 2.4B CNY (≈$338M) | 63 | 52 | |
| 582 | 94.0B JPY (≈$639M) | 63 | 72 | |
| 583 | 3.5B CNY (≈$491M) | 63 | 38 | |
| 584 | 7.7B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 63 | 52 | |
| 585 | 26.1B USD | 63 | 81 | |
| 586 | 19.6B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 63 | 54 | |
| 587 | 7.0B USD | 63 | 59 | |
| 588 | 96.5B JPY (≈$656M) | 63 | 66 | |
| 589 | 22.0B TWD (≈$681M) | 63 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score