Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TCOM · against 99 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #29 of 100 · scores higher than 72% of peers · safety percentile 63
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)6 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including TCOM · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TCOM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 97 reported | 0.17× | 0.74× | 83% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 101 reported | -0.05 | 0.77 | 99% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 95 reported | 1.33× | 1.34× | 48% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 2 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 3 | 16.1B USD | 93 | 66 | |
| 4 | 5.71T JPY (≈$38.8B) | 93 | 82 | |
| 5 | 24.2B USD | 92 | 66 | |
| 25 | 1.46T INR (≈$17.6B) | 72 | 54 | |
| 26 | 39.0B AUD (≈$25.7B) | 70 | 60 | |
| 27 | 22.7B USD | 66 | 55 | |
| 28 | 216.5B HKD (≈$27.7B) | 64 | 76 | |
| 29 | 26.1B USD | 63 | 81 | |
| 30 | 137.5B HKD (≈$17.6B) | 62 | 77 | |
| 31 | 36.3B USD | 61 | 49 | |
| 32 | 15.4B USD | 60 | 74 | |
| 33 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 58 | 79 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score