Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TBBB · against 115 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #86 of 116 · scores higher than 26% of peers · safety percentile 27
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)7 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including TBBB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TBBB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 115 reported | 2.65× | 0.46× | 6% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 111 reported | 0.04 | 0.32 | 84% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 109 reported | 0.68× | 1.51× | 7% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 2 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 3 | 58.1B CNY (≈$8.1B) | 94 | 39 | |
| 4 | 37.3B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 91 | 63 | |
| 5 | 1.68T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 91 | 64 | |
| 82 | 8.2B USD | 31 | 17 | |
| 83 | 11.7B CAD (≈$8.6B) | 30 | 33 | |
| 84 | 4.1B USD | 29 | 63 | |
| 85 | 13.7B USD | 29 | 46 | |
| 86 | 7.6B USD | 27 | 33 | |
| 87 | 7.6B USD | 22 | 45 | |
| 88 | 79.1B NOK (≈$7.5B) | 22 | 38 | |
| 89 | 6.6B USD | 22 | 43 | |
| 90 | 12.9B USD | 21 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score