Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MKC · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #631 of 802 · scores higher than 21% of peers · safety percentile 21
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including MKC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MKC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.66× | 0.44× | 37% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.64 | 0.32 | 18% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 0.66× | 1.53× | 7% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 627 | 1.71T KRW (≈$1.2B) | 22 | 32 | |
| 628 | 79.1B NOK (≈$7.5B) | 22 | 38 | |
| 629 | 6.6B USD | 22 | 43 | |
| 630 | 3.3B CNY (≈$463M) | 21 | 19 | |
| 631 | 12.9B USD | 21 | 62 | |
| 632 | 430M USD | 21 | 32 | |
| 633 | 6.1B CNY (≈$851M) | 21 | 46 | |
| 634 | 44.8B EUR (≈$49.3B) | 21 | 48 | |
| 635 | 1.7B USD | 21 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score