Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66
How AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 stacks up
TBB · against 84 other Miscellaneous companies
Growth
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #50 of 85 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including TBB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Miscellaneous companies.Its metrics sit close to the Miscellaneous norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 63% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 1.3% vs peer median 3.4%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 61% of peers. Revenue growth: 2.7% vs peer median 5.8%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TBB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TBB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 88 reported | 2.7% | 5.8% | 39% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 46 reported | Not reported | 12.6% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 79 reported | 1.3% | 3.4% | 37% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TBB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | ||
| 2 | 1.35T KRW (≈$975M) | 99 | ||
| 3 | 6.6B USD | 98 | ||
| 4 | 506M GBP (≈$658M) | 96 | ||
| 5 | 14.1B USD | 95 | ||
| 46 | Unavailable | 46 | ||
| 47 | 631.1B KRW (≈$454M) | 45 | ||
| 48 | 246.6B KRW (≈$178M) | 44 | ||
| 49 | 3.7B USD | 43 | 30 | |
| 50 | Unavailable | 42 | ||
| 51 | 408.2B KRW (≈$294M) | 40 | ||
| 52 | 449.3B KRW (≈$324M) | 39 | ||
| 53 | Unavailable | 38 | ||
| 54 | 954.8B JPY (≈$6.5B) | 37 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score