Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TATT · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #182 of 2,437 · scores higher than 93% of peers · safety percentile 93
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)244 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including TATT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TATT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.09× | 0.41× | 79% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | 1.00 | 0.61 | 23% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 4.83× | 1.62× | 94% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 178 | 721M USD | 93 | 60 | |
| 179 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 21.93T KRW (≈$15.8B) |
| 93 |
| 59 |
| 180 | 60.9B JPY (≈$414M) | 93 | 82 |
| 181 | 47.9B CNY (≈$6.7B) | 93 | 81 |
| 182 | 504M USD | 93 | 72 |
| 183 | 88.7B JPY (≈$603M) | 93 | 64 |
| 184 | 39.9B JPY (≈$271M) | 92 | 82 |
| 185 | 87.8B JPY (≈$597M) | 92 | 73 |
| 186 | 326M MYR (≈$72M) | 92 | 39 |