Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TAC · against 359 other Utilities companies
Ranked #313 of 360 · scores higher than 13% of peers · safety percentile 13
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including TAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 354 reported | 2.29× | 1.21× | 13% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 347 reported | 0.46 | 0.40 | 43% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 347 reported | 0.84× | 1.05× | 34% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B CNY (≈$260M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$297M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$286M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 369M USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 309 | 6.8B THB (≈$191M) | 14 | 17 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 310 | 10.0B BRL (≈$1.8B) | 14 | 63 |
| 311 | 213M THB (≈$6M) | 14 | 6 |
| 312 | 96.4B HKD (≈$12.3B) | 13 | 51 |
| 313 | 4.2B USD | 13 | 13 |
| 314 | 319M EUR (≈$351M) | 13 | 44 |
| 315 | 4.0B CNY (≈$556M) | 13 | 28 |
| 316 | 460M SGD (≈$350M) | 12 | 73 |
| 317 | 223.2B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 12 | 39 |