Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TAC · against 98 other Utilities companies of similar size
Ranked #88 of 99 · scores higher than 11% of peers · safety percentile 13
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)8 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including TAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 99 reported | 2.29× | 1.12× | 9% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 95 reported | 0.46 | 0.41 | 46% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 95 reported | 0.84× | 1.07× | 35% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 2 | 2.70T CLP (≈$3.0B) | 98 | 59 | |
| 3 | 13.4B BRL (≈$2.4B) | 95 | 94 | |
| 4 | 14.6B BRL (≈$2.6B) | 93 | 88 | |
| 5 | 3.4B USD | 93 | 43 | |
| 84 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 19 | 44 | |
| 85 | 46.6B HKD (≈$6.0B) | 18 | 38 | |
| 86 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.2B) | 17 | 68 | |
| 87 | 219.1B INR (≈$2.6B) | 15 | 52 | |
| 88 | 4.2B USD | 13 | 13 | |
| 89 | 5.2B USD | 11 | 55 | |
| 90 | 10.3B SGD (≈$7.8B) | 11 | 18 | |
| 91 | 45.8B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 8 | 61 | |
| 92 | 4.5B EUR (≈$4.9B) | 8 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score