Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Savers Value Village, Inc.
How Savers Value Village, Inc. stacks up
SVV · against 472 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #275 of 473 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score41 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SVV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 71% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.7% vs peer median 4.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 10.6% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.7% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SVV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SVV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 469 reported | 1.6% | 5.0% | 24% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 482 reported | 8.4% | 9.4% | 44% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 141 reported | 5.7% | 6.9% | 44% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 471 reported | 31.1% | 55.9% | 25% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SVV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 6.9B HKD (≈$885M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 271 | 113.0B JPY (≈$769M) | 47 | 74 | |
| 271 | 1.4B AUD (≈$896M) | 47 | 51 | |
| 275 | 2.5B AUD (≈$1.6B) | 46 | 48 | |
| 275 | 1.1B USD | 46 | 60 | |
| 275 | 1.4B USD | 46 | 38 | |
| 278 | 8.7B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 45 | 46 | |
| 278 | 6.6B CNY (≈$920M) | 45 | 63 | |
| 278 | 22.1B SEK (≈$2.2B) | 45 | 52 | |
| 281 | 16.8B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 44 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score