Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Silvercorp Metals Inc.
How Silvercorp Metals Inc. stacks up
SVM · against 1,320 other Basic Materials companies
Valuation
86/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #180 of 1,321 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score132 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including SVM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 86?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.6% vs peer median 3.6%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 17.0% vs peer median 2.6%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 86% of peers. EBITDA yield: 18.0% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SVM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SVM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,281 reported | 1.4% | 3.8% | 33% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,352 reported | 18.0% | 8.6% | 86% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | 4.5% | 2.6% | 61% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,275 reported | 56.1% | 61.0% | 46% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SVM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 219M MYR (≈$48M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 180 | 15.8B INR (≈$190M) | 86 | 73 | |
| 180 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score