Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SUPX · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #809 of 1,698 · scores higher than 52% of peers · safety percentile 52
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including SUPX · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SUPX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.01× | 0.26× | 89% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | -0.21 | 0.84 | 99% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 6.58× | 1.83× | 94% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 805 | 16.6B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 53 | 63 | |
| 806 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 4.1B AUD (≈$2.7B) |
| 53 |
| 43 |
| 807 | 555M CAD (≈$405M) | 53 | 55 |
| 808 | 5.1B TWD (≈$159M) | 52 | 57 |
| 809 | 208M USD | 52 | 22 |
| 810 | 2.0B CNY (≈$275M) | 52 | 57 |
| 811 | 8.1B HKD (≈$1.0B) | 52 | 40 |
| 812 | 6.2B SEK (≈$619M) | 52 | 37 |
| 813 | 97.9B TWD (≈$3.0B) | 52 | 73 |