Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SUPN · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #542 of 1,373 · scores higher than 61% of peers · safety percentile 61
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including SUPN · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SUPN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.04× | 0.24× | 78% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 0.56 | 0.53 | 48% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 2.08× | 2.62× | 42% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 538 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 61 | 48 | |
| 539 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 70.9B ZAR (≈$3.9B) |
| 61 |
| 48 |
| 540 | 3.4B USD | 61 | 48 |
| 541 | 5.76T KRW (≈$4.1B) | 61 | 59 |
| 542 | 1.6B USD | 61 | 48 |
| 543 | 4.6B SEK (≈$456M) | 60 | 64 |
| 544 | 5.9B HKD (≈$758M) | 60 | 60 |
| 545 | 3.5B CNY (≈$487M) | 60 | 25 |
| 546 | 2.8B CNY (≈$392M) | 60 | 42 |