Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sunbelt Rentals Holdings, Inc.
How Sunbelt Rentals Holdings, Inc. stacks up
SUNB · against 134 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
41/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #101 of 135 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including SUNB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 71% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -11.3% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.4% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.9% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SUNB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SUNB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 136 reported | 3.4% | 7.2% | 27% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 120 reported | -11.3% | 8.7% | 23% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 134 reported | 4.9% | 6.4% | 44% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SUNB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 22.7B USD | 96 | 41 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 20.6B USD | 95 | 61 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 98 | 453.2B SEK (≈$45.3B) | 43 | 50 | |
| 98 | 18.7B USD | 43 | 71 | |
| 100 | 297.1B SEK (≈$29.7B) | 42 | 53 | |
| 101 | 3.91T JPY (≈$26.6B) | 41 | 70 | |
| 101 | 34.2B USD | 41 | 40 | |
| 103 | 49.9B USD | 38 | 42 | |
| 104 | 4.15T JPY (≈$28.2B) | 37 | 50 | |
| 104 | 45.2B USD | 37 | 47 | |
| 106 | 33.36T KRW (≈$24.0B) | 36 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score