Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
STZ · against 69 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #46 of 70 · scores higher than 35% of peers · safety percentile 24
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including STZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | STZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 70 reported | 1.23× | 0.69× | 33% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 69 reported | 0.40 | 0.32 | 40% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 66 reported | 0.91× | 1.16× | 28% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 212.7B CNY (≈$29.8B) | 97 | 72 | |
| 2 | 118.9B CNY (≈$16.7B) | 83 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1.77T JPY (≈$12.0B) | 82 | 57 | |
| 4 | 1.14T INR (≈$13.7B) | 82 | 71 | |
| 5 | 162.4B CNY (≈$22.7B) | 82 | 81 | |
| 42 | 37.1B USD | 30 | 48 | |
| 43 | 13.7B USD | 29 | 46 | |
| 44 | 199.1B CNY (≈$27.9B) | 26 | 43 | |
| 45 | 248.3B CNY (≈$34.8B) | 26 | 29 | |
| 46 | 23.6B USD | 24 | 48 | |
| 47 | 28.1B EUR (≈$30.9B) | 23 | 51 | |
| 48 | 18.2B USD | 23 | 43 | |
| 49 | 12.9B USD | 21 | 62 | |
| 50 | 25.2B USD | 21 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score