Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
How Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. stacks up
STRL · against 307 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #182 of 308 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score53 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including STRL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.3% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.9% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.4% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = STRL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | STRL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 295 reported | 3.9% | 4.1% | 45% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 308 reported | 6.3% | 7.4% | 37% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 155 reported | 4.4% | 3.9% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 293 reported | 12.2% | 32.4% | 12% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around STRL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 9.3B SGD (≈$7.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 49.8B HKD (≈$6.4B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82.6B NOK (≈$7.8B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 5 | 157.6B HKD (≈$20.2B) | 97 | 67 | |
| 175 | 14.2B USD | 48 | 64 | |
| 175 | 11.9B USD | 48 | 51 | |
| 175 | 8.3B USD | 48 | 62 | |
| 182 | 12.0B USD | 47 | 48 | |
| 182 | 11.0B USD | 47 | 65 | |
| 182 | 7.3B USD | 47 | 73 | |
| 185 | 5.1B GBP (≈$6.7B) | 46 | 40 | |
| 185 | 8.6B USD | 46 | 41 | |
| 185 | 5.9B USD | 46 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score