Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Steel Dynamics, Inc.
How Steel Dynamics, Inc. stacks up
STLD · against 54 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #33 of 55 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including STLD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.8% vs peer median 8.5%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.7% vs peer median 2.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.5% vs peer median 3.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = STLD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | STLD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 55 reported | 4.5% | 4.2% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | 6.8% | 9.6% | 38% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 28 reported | 2.7% | 2.6% | 52% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 56 reported | 26.5% | 36.2% | 33% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around STLD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 195.7B HKD (≈$25.0B) | 97 | 74 | |
| 2 | 263.2B HKD (≈$33.7B) | 96 | 71 | |
| 3 | 44.3B AUD (≈$29.3B) | 93 | 73 | |
| 4 | 188.4B CNY (≈$26.4B) | 91 | 79 | |
| 5 | 85.5B CAD (≈$62.4B) | 90 | 85 | |
| 29 | 142.3B SAR (≈$38.4B) | 51 | 44 | |
| 30 | 62.1B USD | 50 | 58 | |
| 31 | 21.3B USD | 49 | 30 | |
| 32 | 38.6B USD | 48 | 60 | |
| 33 | 35.5B USD | 47 | 60 | |
| 34 | 30.3B USD | 45 | 59 | |
| 35 | 2.10T INR (≈$25.2B) | 44 | 50 | |
| 36 | 20.7B USD | 43 | 58 | |
| 36 | 22.7B USD | 43 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score