Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
How Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. stacks up
MLM · against 1,320 other Basic Materials companies
Valuation
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #681 of 1,321 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score132 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including MLM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 65% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.3% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 7.5% vs peer median 3.6%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.5% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MLM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MLM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,281 reported | 2.8% | 3.8% | 43% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,352 reported | 5.4% | 8.6% | 35% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | 2.1% | 2.6% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,275 reported | 35.4% | 61.0% | 26% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MLM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 219M MYR (≈$48M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 681 | 11.3B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 48 | 65 | |
| 681 | 2.9B CAD (≈$2.1B) | 48 | 72 | |
| 681 | 80.4B INR (≈$965M) | 48 | 68 | |
| 681 | 45.0B SEK (≈$4.5B) | 48 | 52 | |
| 681 | 38.6B USD | 48 | 60 | |
| 681 | 11.8B INR (≈$141M) | 48 | 48 | |
| 681 | 1.8B EUR (≈$1.9B) | 48 | 47 | |
| 695 | 141.3B KRW (≈$102M) | 47 | 31 | |
| 695 | 3.1B CNY (≈$432M) | 47 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score