Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
STGW · against 508 other Communication Services companies
Ranked #442 of 509 · scores higher than 13% of peers · safety percentile 13
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)51 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including STGW · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | STGW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 468 reported | 2.41× | 0.40× | 10% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 497 reported | 1.22 | 0.61 | 12% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 498 reported | 0.81× | 1.37× | 23% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B KRW (≈$18M) | 100 | 26 | |
| 2 | 82.4B JPY (≈$560M) | 100 | 76 | |
| 3 | 1.08T JPY (≈$7.4B) | 100 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1.62T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 5 | 615.0B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 438 | 639M USD | 14 | 46 | |
| 439 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 44.34T IDR (≈$2.7B) |
| 14 |
| 58 |
| 440 | 2.74T IDR (≈$170M) | 14 | 34 |
| 441 | 1.7B EUR (≈$1.9B) | 13 | 50 |
| 442 | 2.6B USD | 13 | 34 |
| 443 | 4.6B USD | 13 | 39 |
| 444 | 726M USD | 13 | 31 |
| 445 | 28.39T IDR (≈$1.8B) | 13 | 49 |
| 446 | 4.8B CNY (≈$677M) | 12 | 39 |