Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SSM · against 2 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #1 of 3 · scores higher than 100% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including SSM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | SSM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2 reported | Not reported | -30.6% | — | — | 33% |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1 reported | -85.0% | -85.0% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 3 reported | -10.7% | -23.4% | 100% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1M USD | 4 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3M CAD (≈$2M) | 0 | 19 | |
| 2 | 2M USD | 0 | 5 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score