Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SRTA · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #999 of 1,373 · scores higher than 27% of peers · safety percentile 27
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including SRTA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SRTA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.02× | 0.24× | 87% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 2.26 | 0.53 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 2.64× | 2.62× | 50% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 995 | 14.9B USD | 28 | 65 | |
| 996 | 84M CAD (≈$61M) |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 27 |
| 24 |
| 997 | 1.8B CNY (≈$255M) | 27 | 29 |
| 998 | 27.5B EUR (≈$30.2B) | 27 | 60 |
| 999 | 393M USD | 27 | 61 |
| 1,000 | 1.1B USD | 27 | 43 |
| 1,001 | 3.6B GBP (≈$4.7B) | 27 | 64 |
| 1,002 | 213M EUR (≈$235M) | 27 | 40 |
| 1,003 | 384.1B KRW (≈$277M) | 27 | 40 |