Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Spire Inc.
How Spire Inc. stacks up
SR · against 351 other Utilities companies
Growth
90/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #35 of 352 · scores higher than 90% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score37 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including SR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 90?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Utilities peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.5% vs peer median 2.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.6% vs peer median 2.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 92% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 91.8% vs peer median 1.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 354 reported | 2.6% | 2.5% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 284 reported | 91.8% | 1.6% | 92% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 351 reported | 1.5% | 2.0% | 48% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48.3B BRL (≈$8.7B) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 636M EUR (≈$700M) | 99 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 41 | |
| 31 | 1.1B USD | 91 | 42 | |
| 31 | 5.8B USD | 91 | 41 | |
| 35 | 5.7B NOK (≈$543M) | 90 | 37 | |
| 35 | 896.4B THB (≈$25.1B) | 90 | 44 | |
| 35 | 5.2B USD | 90 | 55 | |
| 38 | 18.8B CNY (≈$2.6B) | 89 | 49 | |
| 38 | 2.21T INR (≈$26.5B) | 89 | 45 | |
| 38 | 43.2B USD | 89 | 54 | |
| 38 | 13.8B EUR (≈$15.2B) | 89 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score