Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Suburban Propane Partners, L.P.
How Suburban Propane Partners, L.P. stacks up
SPH · against 358 other Utilities companies
Valuation
77/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #82 of 359 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score36 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including SPH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 77?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Utilities peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.8% vs peer median 8.6%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 79% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.8% vs peer median 0.0%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 85% of peers. Earnings yield: 11.4% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SPH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SPH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 356 reported | 11.2% | 5.0% | 85% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 11.3% | 8.6% | 71% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 164 reported | 8.8% | -1.8% | 79% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 341 reported | 62.3% | 64.7% | 48% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SPH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8B BRL (≈$497M) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 32.24T IDR (≈$2.0B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 3 | 55.0B HKD (≈$7.0B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 6.8B CNY (≈$945M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 78 | 13.3B BRL (≈$2.4B) | 78 | 75 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score