Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SONO · against 470 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #358 of 471 · scores higher than 24% of peers · safety percentile 27
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)38 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including SONO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SONO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 460 reported | 0.14× | 0.23× | 62% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 452 reported | 1.94 | 0.83 | 7% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 467 reported | 1.61× | 1.89× | 39% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 354 | 1.8B USD | 28 | 30 | |
| 355 | 10.2B SEK (≈$1.0B) | 28 | 57 | |
| 356 | 24.7B SEK (≈$2.5B) | 28 | 56 | |
| 357 | 1.4B USD | 27 | 68 | |
| 358 | 1.9B USD | 27 | 42 | |
| 359 | 8.1B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 26 | 14 | |
| 360 | 53.3B TWD (≈$1.7B) | 26 | 45 | |
| 361 | 1.4B USD | 25 | 33 | |
| 362 | 24.4B CNY (≈$3.4B) | 25 | 14 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score