Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sable Offshore Corp.
How Sable Offshore Corp. stacks up
SOC · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
2/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #368 of 387 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score37 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including SOC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 2?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -91.2% vs peer median 5.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -25.4% vs peer median 12.1%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -117.4% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SOC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SOC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | -133.1% | 5.8% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | -24.5% | 12.4% | 1% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | -117.4% | 6.0% | 1% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 103.1% | 60.0% | 81% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SOC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 368 | 1.8B USD | 2 | 4 | |
| 368 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score