Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SNOW · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,528 of 1,698 · scores higher than 10% of peers · safety percentile 10
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including SNOW · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SNOW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 1.29× | 0.26× | 11% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.33 | 0.84 | 23% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 0.94× | 1.83× | 10% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,524 | 1.2B USD | 10 | 41 | |
| 1,525 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 146M USD |
| 10 |
| 9 |
| 1,526 | 374M USD | 10 | 35 |
| 1,527 | 326M EUR (≈$358M) | 10 | 52 |
| 1,528 | 104.1B USD | 10 | 30 |
| 1,529 | 1.2B USD | 10 | 21 |
| 1,530 | 20.2B TWD (≈$626M) | 10 | 22 |
| 1,531 | 9.2B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 10 | 5 |
| 1,532 | 12.4B USD | 10 | 44 |