Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Snap Inc.
How Snap Inc. stacks up
SNAP · against 470 other Communication Services companies
Valuation
20/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #375 of 471 · scores higher than 20% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including SNAP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 20?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -1.3% vs peer median 8.6%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -3.2% vs peer median 2.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.5% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SNAP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SNAP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 461 reported | -3.2% | 3.0% | 20% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 493 reported | -1.3% | 8.7% | 12% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | 7.5% | 7.6% | 49% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 467 reported | 20.5% | 48.9% | 24% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SNAP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 226M SEK (≈$23M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 370 | 240M USD | 21 | 21 | |
| 375 | 20.7B CNY (≈$2.9B) | 20 | 41 | |
| 375 | 3.4B CNY (≈$475M) | 20 | 52 | |
| 375 | 530.0B JPY (≈$3.6B) | 20 | 39 | |
| 375 | 9.5B USD | 20 | 31 | |
| 375 | 67.5B INR (≈$811M) | 20 | 35 | |
| 380 | 11.0B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 19 | 35 | |
| 380 | 7.7B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 19 | 25 | |
| 380 | 141M EUR (≈$155M) | 19 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score