Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SNA · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #352 of 2,437 · scores higher than 86% of peers · safety percentile 86
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)244 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including SNA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SNA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.22× | 0.41× | 67% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.71 | 0.61 | 42% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 3.43× | 1.62× | 88% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 348 | 160.8B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 86 | 76 | |
| 349 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 71M MYR (≈$16M) |
| 86 |
| 78 |
| 350 | 2.1B CNY (≈$297M) | 86 | 36 |
| 351 | 5.7B CNY (≈$792M) | 86 | 64 |
| 352 | 18.7B USD | 86 | 71 |
| 353 | 161.5B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 86 | 86 |
| 354 | 78.5B JPY (≈$534M) | 86 | 71 |
| 355 | 46.8B INR (≈$562M) | 85 | 34 |
| 356 | 3.3B USD | 85 | 79 |