Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SNA · against 212 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #13 of 213 · scores higher than 94% of peers · safety percentile 86
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)13 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including SNA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SNA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 209 reported | 0.22× | 0.51× | 75% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 209 reported | 0.71 | 0.85 | 62% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 209 reported | 3.43× | 1.44× | 94% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.4B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 3.91T JPY (≈$26.6B) | 95 | 70 | |
| 3 | 1.44T JPY (≈$9.8B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 4 | 28.8B USD | 94 | 73 | |
| 5 | 21.93T KRW (≈$15.8B) | 93 | 59 | |
| 9 | 470.2B TRY (≈$14.1B) | 89 | 76 | |
| 10 | 34.8B USD | 89 | 49 | |
| 11 | 2.69T JPY (≈$18.3B) | 88 | 67 | |
| 12 | 4.15T JPY (≈$28.2B) | 87 | 50 | |
| 13 | 18.7B USD | 86 | 71 | |
| 14 | 2.78T INR (≈$33.3B) | 84 | 72 | |
| 15 | 116.2B CNY (≈$16.3B) | 83 | 71 | |
| 16 | 10.4B USD | 83 | 67 | |
| 17 | 76.7B CNY (≈$10.7B) | 82 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score