Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Snap-on Incorporated
How Snap-on Incorporated stacks up
SNA · against 206 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
43/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #158 of 207 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score25 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including SNA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 4.2% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.0% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SNA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SNA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 208 reported | 4.0% | 7.3% | 31% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 191 reported | 4.2% | 11.9% | 34% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 206 reported | 1.8% | 6.6% | 20% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SNA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.6B) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 12.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 3 | 85.2B CNY (≈$11.9B) | 98 | 75 | |
| 3 | 16.48T KRW (≈$11.9B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 5 | 18.35T KRW (≈$13.2B) | 97 | 56 | |
| 154 | 28.8B USD | 44 | 73 | |
| 154 | 20.3B CHF (≈$23.4B) | 44 | 43 | |
| 154 | 15.8B USD | 44 | 45 | |
| 158 | 11.2B EUR (≈$12.3B) | 43 | 53 | |
| 158 | 18.7B USD | 43 | 71 | |
| 160 | 15.4B USD | 42 | 54 | |
| 160 | 297.1B SEK (≈$29.7B) | 42 | 53 | |
| 162 | 3.91T JPY (≈$26.6B) | 41 | 70 | |
| 162 | 34.2B USD | 41 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score