Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SN · against 91 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #38 of 92 · scores higher than 59% of peers · safety percentile 52
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)8 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including SN · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 88 reported | 0.32× | 0.74× | 71% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 92 reported | 1.20 | 0.77 | 24% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 87 reported | 2.08× | 1.33× | 79% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 2 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 3 | 16.1B USD | 93 | 66 | |
| 4 | 5.71T JPY (≈$38.8B) | 93 | 82 | |
| 5 | 24.2B USD | 92 | 66 | |
| 34 | 123.8B CNY (≈$17.3B) | 55 | 57 | |
| 35 | 3.38T JPY (≈$23.0B) | 54 | 67 | |
| 36 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 54 | 65 | |
| 37 | 31.01T KRW (≈$22.3B) | 52 | 59 | |
| 38 | 29.8B USD | 52 | 63 | |
| 39 | 2.90T INR (≈$34.8B) | 49 | 67 | |
| 40 | 57.2B USD | 47 | 50 | |
| 41 | 18.3B USD | 46 | 55 | |
| 42 | 24.6B USD | 43 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score