Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SharkNinja, Inc.
How SharkNinja, Inc. stacks up
SN · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
88/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #52 of 356 · scores higher than 85% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including SN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 88?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 85% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 58.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 85% of peers. Revenue growth: 15.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 88% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 19.8% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 15.7% | 5.9% | 80% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | 58.8% | 6.2% | 81% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 19.8% | 4.1% | 87% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 49 | 2.70T USD | 89 | 59 | |
| 49 | 5.6B USD | 89 | 69 | |
| 49 | 24.8B USD | 89 | 64 | |
| 52 | 10.0B USD | 88 | 55 | |
| 52 | 29.8B USD | 88 | 63 | |
| 52 | 219M USD | 88 | 56 | |
| 55 | 10.9B USD | 87 | 28 | |
| 55 | 3.2B USD | 87 | 65 | |
| 57 | 7.4B USD | 86 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score